Forget the Banks ... "If You Take Households In Total, They Are Also All Interconnected. They Are Also Too Big To Fail"



If the Banks Are Too Big to Fail, Why Aren't the American People?

In response to the disclosure that the Fed bailed out the Wall Street aristocracy, Huffington Post reports:

"It is a classic case of moral hazard," Dimitri Papadimitriou, president of the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, told The Huffington Post.

***

Papadimitriou told The Huffington Post that the Fed issued many of its biggest loans during the Bush administration, and that "they didn't appear to have any difficulty supporting the financial sector, but very much difficulty supporting the real sector, households."

***

The TARP bailout, led by the Treasury, was the subject of much popular ire when it occurred, since it was seen as a case of the government throwing money at the financial sector at the expense of everyday Americans. Similarly, the Fed's $1.2 trillion in emergency loans were primarily aimed at keeping major financial institutions on their feet.

"One would assume banks are too interconnected, you have to help all of them," Papadimitriou said. "But if you take households in total, they are also all interconnected. They are also too big to fail."

Indeed, by choosing the big banks over the little guy, the government has doomed the economy to failure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“The Gap Between Americans Who Want To Govern Themselves And Politicians Who Want To Rule Over Them May Be As Big Today As The Gap Between The Colonies And England During The 18th Century … The American People Don't Want To Be Governed From The Left, The Right, Or The Center. They Want To Govern Themselves”

The London Tornado of 1091

Regency England as a Backdrop for Romance By Christy English